Allowed

Vijayakumar v. the State Rep by

Madras HC20 Dec 2024CRL OP/31828/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madras High Court granted anticipatory bail to a TNSTC bus driver facing charges for a fatal road accident under BNS and MV Act. The court imposed conditions including daily police reporting, execution of bond, and adherence to investigation protocols, referencing Supreme Court precedent on bail conditions.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted with conditions: bond Rs.10,000 with two sureties, daily police reporting, no tampering, no absconding.

Vijayakumar Vs the State Rep by — Motor Accident Claims | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

Crl.O.P.No.31828 of 2024

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 20-12-2024

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA

¶5

CRL OP NO. 31828 of 2024

¶6

Vijayakumar S/o Vadugandhasamy, 22/23, Sennkalpalayam, Dharapuram, Tiruppur District

¶7

Petitioner(s)

¶8

¶9

The State Rep By The State Represented By Its Inspector Of Police, TIW East Police Station, Coimbatore District

¶10

Respondent(s)

¶11

For Petitioner(s):

¶12

Balaji Thirumoorthy Gobiga Sri R Gokul Selvamani K

¶13

For Respondent(s):

¶14

Public Prosecutor

¶15

ORDER

¶16

The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent

¶17

police for the offences punishable under Sections 281 and 106(1) of BNS and Sections 187, 134(a) and 134(b) of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 in Crime No.569 of 2024, on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

¶18

The case of the prosecution is that, on 29.11.2024, while the

¶19

1/6

¶20

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶21

Crl.O.P.No.31828 of 2024

¶22

petitioner herein was driving TNSTC bus, hit the deceased Srinivasan, who was crossing the entry gate of the Singanallur Bus stand, thereby the deceased

¶23

had sustained severe head injuries and died on the spot. Hence, this case.

¶24

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that petitioner is a TNSTC bus driver and he has no previous case nor involved in any accident in his entire service. He further submitted that the deceased had suddenly and negligently crossed the entry gate of the Singanallur Bus stand, thereby the accident has taken place. He would further submit that the petitioner is ready to produce solvent sureties and to abide by any conditions that may be imposed by this Court and also undertake to appear and to cooperate for the investigation, therefore, he prayed for the grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

¶25

Learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent police opposed for granting of anticipatory bail to the petitioner, stating that, due to rash and negligent driving of the petitioner, while living the bus stand, the accident has taken place, due to which one Srinivasan sustained grievous head injury and died on the spot. He also submitted that the petitioner herein was suspended from his service by the Departmental authorities

¶26

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 2/6

¶27

Crl.O.P.No.31828 of 2024

¶28

concerned and enquiry proceedings has been initiated against the petitioner. He further submitted that the petitioner herein has no previous case.

¶29

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned

¶30

Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent police and perused the materials available on record including the FIR.

¶31

Taking note of the facts and circumstances of the case, the submissions made by the learned counsel on either side and considering the fact that the petitioner has no previous case and he was suspended from his service, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.

¶32

Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in

¶33

the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy made ready, before the learned Judicial Magistrate-VIII, Coimbatore on condition that the petitioner shall execute a separate bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned

¶34

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶35

3/6

¶36

Crl.O.P.No.31828 of 2024

¶37

Magistrate concerned, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed and on further condition that:

¶38

[a] the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity.

¶39

[b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police everyday at 10:30 a.m., for a period of two weeks and thereafter, first and third Saturdays of every month at 10:30 a.m., until further orders.

¶40

[c] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

¶41

[d] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

¶42

[e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

¶43

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶44

4/6

¶45

Crl.O.P.No.31828 of 2024

¶46

[f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of B.N.S.

20.12.2024

stn

The State Rep By The State Represented By Its Inspector Of Police, TIW East Police Station, Coimbatore District

¶51

A.D. JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J.

¶52

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶53

5/6

¶54

Crl.O.P.No.31828 of 2024

¶55

stn

¶56

Crl.O.P. No.31828 of 2024

¶57

20.12.2024

¶58

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶59

6/6

Vijayakumar v. the State Rep by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vijayakumar v. the State Rep by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M.Devendran Vs The State Rep by

Periyasamy Vs The State Rep by

Arjun Krishna Kondamani Vs M.Devendran

S.Subash Vs the State Represented by the Inspector of Polcie

Sathish M Vs the State Rep.by

Abdul Vahid Rizhwan Vs State, Rep. by the Inspector of Police