Allowed

M.Marudhappan v. the State Rep. by the Inspector of Police

Madras HC12 Dec 2024CRL OP/31132/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed a Criminal Original Petition filed by a Forest Department legal officer facing trial. The petitioner sought the summoning of a government vehicle log book for cross-examination, which the trial court had previously dismissed. The High Court held it was too premature to evaluate relevancy at this stage and allowed the petition, emphasizing defence secrecy.

What did the court decide?

The Criminal Original Petition and connected miscellaneous petition were allowed; the log book of the government vehicle was summoned.

M.Marudhappan Vs the State Rep. by the… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

CRL.O.P.No.31132 of 2024 and Crl.M.P.No.17739 of 2024

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

Dated : 12.12.2024

¶4

CORAM : MR. JUSTICE N.SESHASAYEE

¶5

CRL.O.P.No.31132 of 2024 and Crl.M.P.No.17739 of 2024

M.Marudhappan

... Petitioner

Vs.

1.The State Rep. by The Inspector of Police Vigilance and Anti Corruption Chennai City - I

¶10

2.The Forest Department Principal Chief Conservator of Forest Panagal Maligai, No.1, Greens Road Saidapet, Chennai ... Respondents

¶11

PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 528 of B.N.S.S. Act, 2023, to set aside the order passed by the learned Special Court for the Cases under Prevention of Corruption Act at Chennai-104, in Crl.M.P.No.58 of 2024 dated 21.11.2024 in C.C.No.7 of 2016.

¶12

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Suresh

¶13

For Respondents : Mr.K.M.D.Muhilan Government Advocate (Crl. Side)

¶14

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶15

1/4

¶16

ORDER

¶17

CRL.O.P.No.31132 of 2024 and Crl.M.P.No.17739 of 2024

¶18

The petitioner, a legal officer of the Forest Department is now facing trial for charges U/s.7 and Section 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The trial is now underway and PW.4 is being examined. For cross examining PW.4 vis-a-vis certain aspects which the defence considers it essential, the petitioner herein had filed a petition in Crl.M.P.No.58 of 2024 U/s.91 Cr.P.C. for summoning the log book of the official Government Vehicle bearing No.TN30G0031. This came to be dismissed by the trial Court on the ground that the petition does not disclose the reason for summoning it. Hence this petition.

¶19

2.Heard both sides. This Court would appreciate if the trial Court appreciates that a defence is not supposed to disclose its line of defence or strategy, and they are entitled to certain degree of secrecy. After all, what is in stake is the liberty of the citizen and hence unlike the civil litigation in criminal litigation the accused can bring certain surprises to the prosecution, and the beauty of cross examination in any form of litigation is to bring those surprises to the witness.

¶20

2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶21

CRL.O.P.No.31132 of 2024 and Crl.M.P.No.17739 of 2024

¶22

3.The conclusion is the writing on the wall. This Court deems it appropriate to allow this petition, for this Court considers it too premature a stage for the Court to evaluate the relevancy of the document which now sought to be summoned.

¶23

4.This Criminal Original Petition stands allowed accordingly. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶24

12.12.2024

¶25

kas

¶26

Index : Yes / No Neutral Citation

¶27

Note: Issue order copy today

¶28

¶29

1.The Special Court for the Cases under Prevention of Corruption Act Chennai-104

¶30

2.The Inspector of Police Vigilance and Anti Corruption Chennai City - I

¶31

3/4

¶32

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶33

CRL.O.P.No.31132 of 2024 and Crl.M.P.No.17739 of 2024

¶34

N.SESHASAYEE, J.

¶35

kas

¶36

3.The Principal Chief Conservator of Forest The Forest Department Panagal Maligai, No.1, Greens Road Saidapet, Chennai

¶37

4.The Public Prosecutor High Court of Madras Chennai 600 104

¶38

CRL.O.P.No.31132 of 2024 and Crl.M.P.No.17739 of 2024

¶39

12.12.2024

¶40

4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

M.Marudhappan v. the State Rep. by the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M.Marudhappan v. the State Rep. by the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

T.v.Madhavan (Deceased) S/O.S.P.Tirumalai Vs R.Saravanan (Deceased) S/O.Rajamanickam

M.Kannan Vs State Rep.by

State by Vs K.Gajendran

K.Balachandran Vs the State by, the Inspector of Police

R.Arutprakasam Vs State Rep by

S.Govindaraj Vs the State by, the Inspector of Police