In this CRL O.P. regarding petitioner's arrest, the High Court dismissed the petition as infructuous after counsel's submission. No separate reasoning or legal principles were discussed in the brief order dated 12-12-2024.
Petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
CRL OP. 30619 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 12-12-2024
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI
CRL OP. 30619 of 2024
PETER LINGAM A S/O.ANGAPPAN, NO.20/2, PATHINARUKAL MANDAPA STREET, CHIDAMBARAM POST, CHIDAMBARAM AND DISTRICT.
PETITIONER(S)
Vs
THE STATE REPRESENTED BY ITS THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, CRIME BRANCH CRIME INVESTIGATION DIVISION (CBCID), CUDDALORE DISTRICT. CRIME NO.1 OF 2024
RESPONDENT(S)
For Petitioner(s):
MK.RAJINIKANTH T.ARUL G.THAMIZHAZHAGAN
For Respondent(s):
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
2
ORDER
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has
been arrested by the respondent police. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed as infractous.
12-12-2024
pbl
TO THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, CRIME BRANCH CRIME INVESTIGATION DIVISION (CBCID), CUDDALORE DISTRICT.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petition is infructuous given that the petitioner was arrested by the respondent police.
PETER LINGAM
THE STATE REPRESENTED BY ITS THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, CRIME BRANCH CRIME INVESTIGATION DIVISION (CBCID), CUDDALORE DISTRICT.
T.V.THAMILSELVI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
