Rahmadulla v. State Rep by
Case brief
What is this about?
Criminal Original Petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash an FIR. The petition was dismissed as infructuous because the investigation was completed and a final report was filed.
What did the court decide?
Petition dismissed as infructuous.
What the court decided
Crl.O.P.No.29404 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 05.01.2024
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI
Crl.O.P.No.29404 of 2022 and Crl.M.P.No.18017 of 2022
1.Rahmadulla 2.Fathima ... Petitioners
Vs.
1.The State by Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Villianur Pondicherry-605 003.
2.Shakila
... Respondents
Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to call for the records and to quash the FIR registered against the petitioners in Crime No.4 of 2022 pending investigation on the file of the 1st respondent Police.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the prayer to quash the FIR has become infructuous due to the completion of investigation and filing of the final report.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
1.Rahmadulla 2.Fathima
- respondent
1.The State by Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Villianur Pondicherry-605 003
- respondent
2.Shakila
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court