Petitioners sought anticipatory bail in a case under Sections 498(A) and 494 IPC registered on a wife's complaint; investigation had not commenced. The defacto complainant filed an intervening petition seeking her husband's whereabouts. The court declined anticipatory bail and dismissed the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Crl.O.P.No.29277 of 2023
Crl.O.P.No.29277 of 2023 and Crl.M.P.No.732 of 2024
C.V.KARTHIKEYAN.,J.
The petitioners/A2,A3 and A4 seek anticipatory bail in Crime No.28 of 2023, registered by the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 498(A), 494 of IPC.
lodged by the 2nd petitioner/A3, which has been registered in Crime No.992 of 2023 on 10.10.2023 by Vellapalayam Police Station, Tiruppur.
submitted that the petitioners are innocent persons and they have been falsely implicated in this case. He further submitted that A2 had innocently married A1, without knowledge of the fact that A1 was already married to the defacto complainant.
1/2
Crl.O.P.No.29277 of 2023
C.V.KARTHIKEYAN.,J.
ari
petition. The learned counsel for the intervenor submitted that the intervenor is interested in knowing about the whereabouts of her husband/A1.
29.01.2024
ari
Crl.O.P.No.29277 of 2023
2/2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to A2 to A4 when the investigation in Crime No.28 of 2023 had not commenced.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
A2, A3 and A4
State (respondent police)
C.V.Karthikeyan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
