Partly allowed

Dhandapani Chinnasamy v. the Sr.Inspector of Police

Madras HC8 Nov 2024CRL OP/26502/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court granted interim interstate anticipatory bail for three weeks to a petitioner accused under Sections 318 and 336 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to enable him to approach the jurisdictional court for regular bail, pending surrender.

What did the court decide?

Interim interstate anticipatory bail granted for three weeks; petitioner directed to surrender within 15 days and execute bond of Rs.20,000;

Dhandapani Chinnasamy Vs the Sr.Inspector of Police — Bail and Remand | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

Crl.O.P.No.26502 of 2024

¶2

Crl.O.P.No.26502 of 2024

¶3

A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J.

¶4

The petitioner/Accused, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the first respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 318 and

¶5

336 of BNS, 2023, in Crime No. Not Known of 2024 (Preliminary Enquiry No.110 of 2024), seeks anticipatory bail.

¶6

2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondent police and perused the materials available on record.

¶7

3.The learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner was doing business and relating to the same, it seems that the third party has given a complaint on the file of the first respondent police, upon which, there is an imminent threat of arrest. Hence, the petitioner intends to approach the appropriate jurisdictional Court with appropriate relief so as to enable them to approach the appropriate Court by way of interim relief, they have approached this Court by way of interstate anticipatory bail.

¶8

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶9

1/4

¶10

Crl.O.P.No.26502 of 2024

¶11

4.In view thereof, notice was issued to the first respondent police.

¶12

Even though notice has been served, nobody is appearing on behalf of the first respondent.

¶13

5.The imminent threat, which is expressed on behalf of the petitioner,

¶14

and considering the nature of allegations in this case relating to the investment of the money of the defacto complainant and considering the fact that a breathing time can be given to the petitioner to approach the jurisdictional Court by way of filing an appropriate anticipatory bail application or to surrender before the concerned Court and come out on bail, this Court is inclined to grant interstate interim anticipatory bail to the petitioner for a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order to enable them to move to the concerned Court.

¶15

6.Accordingly, interim interstate anticipatory bail is granted to the

¶16

petitioner for a period of three weeks, on condition that the petitioner shall surrender before the second respondent police within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy made is ready and the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand only) to

¶17

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶18

2/4

¶19

Crl.O.P.No.26502 of 2024

¶20

the satisfaction of the second respondent police. Further, within three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, the petitioner shall approach the competent Court at Mumbai and seek appropriate relief.

¶21

7.The order granted by this Court shall remain in force for a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order or until such time regular orders are passed by the appropriate Court, whichever is earlier. Failure on the part of the petitioner to comply with the order within the time frame fixed by this Court, the order shall stand, automatically, cancelled.

¶22

8.With the above direction, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed

08.11.2024

ata

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶27

3/4

¶28

Crl.O.P.No.26502 of 2024

¶29

A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J.

¶30

ata

¶31

Crl.O.P.No.26502 of 2024

¶32

08.11.2024

¶33

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶34

4/4

Dhandapani Chinnasamy v. the Sr.Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dhandapani Chinnasamy v. the Sr.Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kiran @ Kiransai Vs State Rep by

S.Sivakumar Vs State, Rep. by

Chitarasan Vs B.Mohan

M Dhanasekar Vs State Rep by

Srinithi Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. Vs the Sr.Inspector of Police

Narasimman Vs the State Rep. by