Dismissed

Eswaran v. State by

Madras HC25 Oct 2024CRL OP/26493/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a Criminal Original Petition under Sections 482 CrPC/528 BNSS and Section 15A SC & ST Act, the High Court dismissed the petitioner's plea for directing surrender acceptance and bail consideration, ruling that Section 15A precludes such accommodation to maintain the spirit of the statute.

What did the court decide?

Crl.O.P. disposed of with direction to trial court not to violate the spirit of Statute. Bail prayer cannot be acceded.

Eswaran Vs State by — Caste Atrocities | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

Crl.O.P.No.26493 of 2024

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 25.10.2024

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN

¶6

Crl.O.P.No.26493 of 2024

¶7

1.Eswaran

¶8

2.Jayabangaiyarselvi @ Selvi

¶9

... Petitioners

¶10

Vs.

¶11

1.The State Rep.by The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Dharapuram, Tiruppur District.

¶12

2.The State by The Inspector of Police, Moolanur Police Station, Tiruppur District Crime No.346 of 2024. ... Respondents

¶13

Prayer: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C.,/ 528 BNSS, pleased to direct the S pecial Judge for SC & ST Act cases/ Principal District Judge, Tiruppur to accept the surrender and consider the Bail Petition to be filed by the petitioners on the same day, on merits in connection with the case in Crime No. 346 of 2024 pending investigation on the file of the Respondent Police.

¶14

For Petitioners : Mr.N.Ponraj

¶15

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶16

1/4

¶17

Crl.O.P.No.26493 of 2024

¶18

For Respondents : Mr.K.M.D.Muhilan Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

¶19

O R D E R

¶20

This Criminal Original Petition is filed seeking direction to

¶21

consider the Bail application of the petitioners herein, who apprehend

¶22

arrest for the offence under SC/ST Act.

¶23

2. In view of Section 15A of the SC & ST Act, the prayer in

¶24

this petition cannot be acceded and therefore, this Criminal Original

¶25

Petition is disposed of with a direction to the trial Court that there should

¶26

not be violation of mandate spirit of the Statute.

¶27

25.10.2024

¶28

Index : Yes/No

¶29

Neutral Citation : Yes/No rpl

¶30

¶31

1.The Special Judge for SC & ST Act cases/ Principal District Judge, Tiruppur

¶32

2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Dharapuram, Tiruppur District.

¶33

3.The Inspector of Police, Moolanur Police Station, Tiruppur District

¶34

2/4

¶35

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶36

Crl.O.P.No.26493 of 2024

¶37

The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras, Chennai.

¶38

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶39

3/4

¶40

Crl.O.P.No.26493 of 2024

¶41

Dr.G.JAYACHANDRAN,J.

¶42

rpl

¶43

C rl.O.P.No.26493 of 2024

¶44

25.10.2024

¶45

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 4/4

Eswaran v. State by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Eswaran v. State by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

C.Duraikannu Vs Assistant Commissioner Ofpolice

Senthilkumar Vs the Inspector of Police

L.Albert Vs S.Balaji

V.Selvaraj Vs State by

R.Rasu Vs State Rep by

R.Shanthi Vs Murugesan