for the Intervener and the status report filed by the Inspector of Police, Perundurai Circle, Erode District, I find that there was a money transaction between the parties. The complainant's husband viz., Dr.Kuppsamy needs to pay a sum of Rs.1,66,00,000/- to the Canara Bank to avoid SARFAESI proceedings and some transactions were said to have been taken place. Two sets of power of attorneys are said to have been involved in this case. One is general power of attorney, which said to have been executed by the defacto complainant on 03.09.2013, which was also cancelled on 06.02.2015 for certain irregularities alleged to have been made by the agent. When one set of fact being so, there is another set of facts viz., the first and second accused who are daughter and mother, have come forward with a different case before the civil Court in O.S.No.88 of 2018 that there was a general power of attorney dated 02.09.2012 to the first accused. Based on which she had entered into an agreement of sale on 26.10.2012 with the second accused and based upon the said agreement the second accused (Petitioner herein) filed a suit for specific performance of the alleged unregistered sale agreement (notarised sale agreement dated 26.10.2012) in
