Allowed

Rejitha Salin v. the State Rep by

Madras HC4 Nov 2024CRL OP/25261/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The single judge granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner who apprehended arrest for offences under the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956, subject to specific conditions including reporting to the police and execution of a bond with sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner granted anticipatory bail subject to execution of bond, posting of sureties, and complying with daily reporting and non- tampering conditions.

Rejitha Salin Vs the State Rep by — Bail and Remand | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

Crl.O.P.No.25261 of 2024

¶2

Crl.O.P.No.25261 of 2024

¶3

A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J.

¶4

The petitioner/A1, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 3(2)a, 4(1), 5(1) of Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956, in Crime No.23 of 2024, on

¶5

the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

¶6

2.The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner along with the other accused, in the guise of running a Beauty Parlour, involved in prostitution. Hence, the case.

¶7

3 . The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the Petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He would further submit that the petitioner has given the SPA on lease and without the knowledge of the petitioner, the Manager has involved in the said offence. He would further submit that there is no previous case against the petitioner. He would further submit that the petitioner is ready to abide by any condition that may be imposed by this Court. Hence, he prays for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

¶8

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶9

1/4

¶10

Crl.O.P.No.25261 of 2024

¶11

4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) would submit that the

¶12

petitioner along with the other accused, in the guise of running a SPA, indulged in prostitution. He would further submit that the petitioner is the owner of the SPA. He would further submit that there is no previous case against the petitioner. However, he vehemently opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

¶13

5.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) for the respondent and perused the materials available on record.

¶14

6.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner subject to the following conditions:

¶15

(a) Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the

¶16

date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the Judicial Magistrate I, Alandur, Chengalpet District , on condition that the petitioner shall execute

¶17

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶18

2/4

¶19

Crl.O.P.No.25261 of 2024

¶20

a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only), with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the said Magistrate, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed and on further condition that:

¶21

[b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., for a period of two weeks and thereafter, on every Monday at 10.30 a.m., until further orders.

¶22

[c] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;

¶23

[d] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

¶24

[e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the Petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the Petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560];

¶25

[ f ] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 BNS.

¶26

04.11.2024

¶27

ata

¶28

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶29

3/4

¶30

Crl.O.P.No.25261 of 2024

¶31

A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J.

¶32

ata

¶33

Crl.O.P.No.25261 of 2024

¶34

04.11.2024

¶35

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶36

4/4

Rejitha Salin v. the State Rep by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rejitha Salin v. the State Rep by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shriram Finance Ltd. Vs Meenakshi M

M/S.Kuriosfinvest LLP Vs Greater Chennai Corporation

T.Pandurangan Vs Sri Kannabiran Temple

Vikramathithan Vs The State Through

Sivananth Vs The Stare Rep by

Dinesh Kumar Vs the State by