Dismissed

V.Kanagaraj Kumar v. the State of Tamilnadu Rep by

Madras HC21 Oct 2024CRL OP/24993/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Court refused to quash FIR implicating petitioners in forgery and cheating. Held premature to declare them innocent purchasers; directed Police to investigate documents and verify petitioners' role to ascertain if they were privy to the crime.

What did the court decide?

Directed Police to examine documents and ascertain if petitioners are privy to the crime before filing a final report.

V.Kanagaraj Kumar Vs the State of Tamilnadu Rep by — Cheating and Forgery | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

Crl.O.P.No.24993 of 2024

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 21.10.2024

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN

¶6

Crl.O.P.No. 24993 of 2024 and Crl.M.P.No.14022 of 2024

¶7

V.Kanagaraj Kumar

¶8

K.Kavitha ... Petitioners

¶9

Vs.

¶10

The State of Tamil Nadu Represented by The Inspector of Police, CCB-I, Chennai – 600 008.

¶11

Mr.W.P.Padmanabhan

¶12

Mr.W.P.Murali ... Respondents

¶13

Prayer: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C to call for the records and quash FIR No.123 of 2021 pending on the file of CCB-I, Chennai, against the petitioners.

¶14

For Petitioners : Mr.Vivekanand

¶15

For Respondents : Mr.K.M.D.Muhilan Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

¶16

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶17

1/5

¶18

Crl.O.P.No.24993 of 2024

¶19

O R D E R

¶20

The petitioners, who were arrayed as accused Nos.5 and 6 in Crime No.123 of 2021 on the file of the respondents/Police for the offences under Sections 465, 467, 468, 471 r/w 34 and 109 IPC are before this Court to quash the complaint on the ground that they are bona fide purchasers from Ponnurangam and Prasanthi, who had alleged to have created bogus documents and title deeds for the property and cheated the de-facto complainant claiming that the petitioners are the victims of the crime and submitted that the case against them has to be quashed.

¶21

2. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the first respondent/Police submits that investigation in this case is under way, the bona fide of the petitioners is to be investigated. Since based on the forged documents the property being alienated to these petitioners whether they are privy to the crime being thoroughly investigated, based on the out come of the investigation the Police would file a final report.

¶22

3. On the face of the records, the property which is now purchased

¶23

by these two petitioners had not sold by genuine owners. Therefore, the

¶24

2/5

¶25

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶26

Crl.O.P.No.24993 of 2024

¶27

involvement of the petitioners in the crime to attract Sections 34 or 109 IPC is the matter of pending investigation. Only on completion of investigation the first respondent/Police will be in position to verify as to whether the petitioners are arrayed as accused or witnesses.

¶28

4. It is pre-matured for this Court to hold that the petitioners are innocent purchasers. Therefore, without prejudice to the right of the petitioners herein, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of directing the first respondent/Police to examine the documents and materials placed by the petitioners herein to ascertain as to whether they are privy to the crime and then file a final report. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶29

21.10.2024

¶30

Index: Yes/No Speaking Order/Non-Speaking Order Neutral Citation Case : Yes/No ms

¶31

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶32

3/5

¶33

Crl.O.P.No.24993 of 2024

¶34

¶35

The Inspector of Police, CCB-I,

¶36

Chennai – 600 008.

¶37

The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

¶38

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶39

4/5

¶40

Crl.O.P.No.24993 of 2024

¶41

Dr.G.JAYACHANDRAN, J.

¶42

¶43

Crl.O.P.No. 24993 of 2024 and Crl.M.P.No.14022 of 2024

¶44

21.10.2024

¶45

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 5/5

V.Kanagaraj Kumar v. the State of Tamilnadu Rep by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

V.Kanagaraj Kumar v. the State of Tamilnadu Rep by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

S.Vignesh Selvaraj Vs the Inspector of Police

M.Palani Ex.Army Vs the Superintendent of Police

Sathish Vs the State Represented by

M.Sivasankar Vs G.Abirami

S.Nagarajan Vs the State Rep by Its

Rajamani Vs the Joint Director and Head of the Zone