Anticipatory bail sought by persons apprehending arrest under the TN Prohibition Act for possession of 20 liters of banned liquor. The court granted anticipatory bail subject to conditions including bonds, sureties, daily police reporting for two weeks, and non-tampering with evidence.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Crl.O.P.No.2421 of 2024
Crl.O.P.No.2421 of 2024 C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J.
The petitioners, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 4(1)(a) and 4(1-A) of TN Prohibition Act in Crime No. 441 of 2023, seek anticipatory bail.
2 . It is stated that the petitioners were found in possession of 20 liters of banned liquor. Hence, the complaint.
3 . Taking into consideration of all the facts, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions.
4 . Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy made ready, before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Mettur , on condition that the petitioner shall execute a separate bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of this Court concerned, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed and on further condition that:
[a] the petitioners and the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity.
Crl.O.P.No.2421 of 2024
[b] the petitioners shall report before the respondent police everyday at 10.30 a.m for a period of two weeks and thereafter as and when required for interrogation.
[c] the petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.
[d] the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.
[e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].
[f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.
08.02.2024
smn
Crl.O.P.No.2421 of 2024
C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J.
smn
Crl.O.P.No.2421 of 2024
08.02.2024
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioners apprehending arrest under the TN Prohibition Act for possession of banned liquor should be granted anticipatory bail.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
P.K.Shaji vs. State of KeralaRelied on¶4
(2005)AIR SCW 5560 · Who else cites this
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Petitioners
Respondent Police
C.V.Karthikeyan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
