Fourth accused in a banned tobacco products seizure case sought anticipatory bail after two prior applications were dismissed. With A2 and A3 still absconding and no change in circumstances, the court dismissed the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Crl.O.P.No.2353 of 2024
Crl.O.P.No.2353 of 2024
C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J.
The petitioner/fourth accused, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offence punishable under Section 6 read with 20(1) COTPA Act 2003 & 328 of IPC in Crime No.194 of 2023, seeks anticipatory bail.
1
Crl.O.P.No.2353 of 2024
C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J.
vsg
13.03.2024
vsg
Crl.O.P.No.2353 of 2024
2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the fourth accused apprehending arrest for transporting banned tobacco products, when no change in circumstances since earlier dismissals?
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Petitioner (fourth accused)
Respondent Police
C.V. Karthikeyan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
