The court held that since the petitioner's inquiry under C.S.R.No.12 of 2024 was pending, the issue of anticipatory bail could not arise. The petition was consequently dismissed with liberty to file a fresh application if necessary.
Petition dismissed; liberty to file fresh petition if need arises.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Crl.O.P.No.2348 of 2024
C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J.
It is stated by the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) for the respondent that petition enquiry is pending in C.S.R.No.12 of 2024.
2.The respondent may continue with the enquiry in C.S.R.No.12 of 2024, the petition seeking anticipatory bail will not arise.
3.Therefore, this petition stands dismissed with liberty to file a fresh petition, if need arises.
14.02.2024
smv
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the pending inquiry in C.S.R.No.12 of 2024 renders this anticipatory bail petition moot.
C.V. KARTHIKEYAN
RESPONDENT
C.V.KARTHIKEYAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
