Allowed

Karthick @ Kaasimedu Karthick v. State Rep by

Madras HC26 Feb 2024CRL OP/2252/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner was A1 in a case for possession of 1.200 kgs of ganja under the NDPS Act; he had absconded and been re-arrested. Considering the factors and period of incarceration, the High Court granted regular bail on bond with conditions including daily reporting to the trial Court.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail on Rs.10,000 bond each with two sureties (one blood surety), with conditions including daily reporting before the trial Court at 10.30 a.m.

Karthick @ Kaasimedu Karthick Vs State Rep by — Narcotics (NDPS) | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

Crl.O.P.No.2252 of 2024

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 26.02.2024

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN

¶6

Crl.O.P.No.2252 of 2024

¶7

Karthick @ Kaasimedu Karthick ...petitioner

¶8

Vs.

¶9

State represented by The Inspector of Police, H-1 Washermenpet Police Station, Chennai.

¶10

Crime No.2563 of 2021.

¶11

...Respondent

¶12

PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. praying to enlarge the petitioner on bail in C.C.No.52 of 2022 on the file of the I Additional Special Court for Exclusive Trial of Cases under NDPS Act, Chennai.

¶13

For petitioner : Mr.D.Padmanabhan

¶14

For Respondent : Mr.L.Baskaran Government Advocate (Crl.side)

¶15

ORDER

¶16

The petitioner is arrayed as A1 in C.C.No.52 of 2022 now pending

¶17

1/5

¶18

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶19

Crl.O.P.No.2252 of 2024

¶20

before the I Additional Special Court for Exclusive Trial of Cases under NDPS Act, Chennai.

¶21

2.There are totally three accused. The petitioner is arrayed as A1. A2 died. A3 is under the custody in yet another case and now Non Bailable Warrant had also been issued against him.

¶22

3.The learned Government Advocate (crl.side) stated that formal arrest would be effected on A3. Sofar as the petitioner is concerned, he absconded from judicial process on 30.01.2023 necessitating Non Bailable Warrant to be issued. The petitioner was remanded again only on 02.12.2023.

¶23

4.Originally, crime No.2563 of 2021 had been registered by the respondent Police for the offences under Sections 8(c) r/w 20(b)(ii)(B) of NDPS Act. All the accused were in possession of 1.200 kgs of Ganja.

¶24

5.Taking all the factors into consideration and the period of incarceration, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner subject to the following conditions:

¶25

Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only)

¶26

2/5

¶27

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶28

Crl.O.P.No.2252 of 2024

¶29

each with two sureties, (out of which, one must be a blood surety) each

¶30

for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned I Additional Special

¶31

Court for Exclusive Trial of Cases under NDPS Act, Chennai and on further conditions that :-

¶32

[a] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity.

¶33

[b] the petitioner shall report before the trial Court, everyday at 10.30 a.m., until further orders.

¶34

[c] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

¶35

[d] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

¶36

[e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

¶37

3/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶38

Crl.O.P.No.2252 of 2024

¶39

[f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.

26.02.2024

vkr

The I Additional Special Court for Exclusive Trial of Cases under NDPS Act, Chennai

¶44

The Central Prison II, Puzhal.

¶45

The Inspector of Police, H-1 Washermenpet Police Station, Chennai.

¶46

4.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.

¶47

4/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶48

Crl.O.P.No.2252 of 2024

¶49

C.V.KARTHIKEYAN. J.

¶50

vkr

¶51

Crl.O.P.No.2252 of 2024

¶52

26.02.2024

¶53

5/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Karthick @ Kaasimedu Karthick v. State Rep by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Karthick @ Kaasimedu Karthick v. State Rep by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

R. Ashokan Vs State Rep.by

Jayaraman Vs State Rep. by

Boopathi Vs State Rep by Its

Vivek Vs the Inspector of Police

C.Thangaraj Vs the Inspector of Police

Muthu Vs the State Rep.by