Complainant sought leave to appeal against acquittal of the respondent in a cheque dishonour case under Section 138 NI Act. The court found merit in the contention that rebuttal of statutory presumption needed consideration and granted leave.
Leave granted to file appeal against acquittal; appeal directed to be numbered and posted for admission.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CRL OP. 22088 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 12-12-2024
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN
CRL OP. 22088 of 2024
AND
CRL A SR. 45164 OF 2024
ADAIKALAM S/O. MUTHU, NO. MIG 568 NEW TEMPLE LAND AND CO, HOSUR, KRISHNAGIRI DISTRICT 635 109
PETITIONER(S)
Vs
ANNAMALAI S/O. LAKSHMANAREDDIYAR, NO. 63, B2 BALAJI APARTMENT, PRITHIVAKKAM (NEAR LIC ZONAL OFFICE0 AMBATTUR CHENNAI
RESPONDENT(S)
CRL A SR. 45164 of 2024
ADAIKALAM
APPELLANT(S)
Vs
ANNAMALAI
RESPONDENT(S)
CRL OP. 22088 of 2024
For Petitioner(s):
M.P.SARAVANAN S. SURESH P. VEERA NARAYANAN For Respondent(s):
CRL A SR. 45164 of 2024
For Appellant(s)(s): For Respondent(s):
ORDER
Aggrieved by the acquittal of the respondent for the offence punishable under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, the petitioner/complainant has filed the present petition seeking leave to file an appeal.
12-12-2024
cse
CRL OP. 22088 of 2024
To
CRL A SR. 45164 of 2024
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the complainant should be granted leave to appeal against acquittal of the accused under Section 138 NI Act.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Adaikalam S/o. Muthu
Annamalai S/o. Lakshmanareddiyar
Sunder Mohan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
