Allowed

Dinesh v. the State Rep by Its

Madras HC10 Sept 2024CRL OP/21630/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Accused sought modification of a bail condition requiring him to be available for police interrogation, citing a life threat from rival parties. With investigation complete and charge sheet filed, the High Court modified the condition to require appearance before the jurisdictional Magistrate every Monday for four weeks, leaving other conditions unaltered.

What did the court decide?

Condition modified: petitioner to appear before jurisdictional Magistrate Court every Monday for 4 weeks; other conditions unaltered.

Dinesh Vs the State Rep by Its — Bail and Remand | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

CRL O.P. No.21630 of 2024

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

Dated : 10.09.2024

¶4

CORAM

¶5

The Hon`ble Mr.Justice P.DHANABAL

¶6

CRL OP.No.21630 of 2024

¶7

Dinesh S/o. Raghuraman ... Petitioner / Accused

¶8

¶9

State rep. by:-

¶10

The Inspector of Police, Otteri Police Station, Tambaram City. ... Respondent [Cr. No.40 of 2024] PRAYER: - The Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section

¶11

483(1)(b) of The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, praying to

¶12

modify the condition imposed in the order dated 13.06.2024 in Crl. M.P.

¶13

No.1754 of 2024 passed by the Judicial Magistrate No.II, Chengalpattu.

¶14

For Petitioners : Mr. M. Vijaya Ragavan

¶15

For Respondent : Mr. S. Santhosh Government Advocate [Criminal side]

¶16

ORDER

¶17

1/4

¶18

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶19

CRL O.P. No.21630 of 2024

¶20

This petition has been filed seeking to modify the condition imposed in the order dated 13.06.2024 in Crl. M.P. No.1754 of 2024 passed by the Judicial Magistrate No.II, Chengalpattu.

¶21

The petitioner was granted bail vide order dated 13.06.2024

¶22

passed in C.M.P. No.1754 of 2024 by the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Chengalpattu on the condition that the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by a police office as and when required . The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has filed this petition to modify the said condition by stating that there is a life threat from rival parties.

¶23

The learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) would submit that the petitioner was granted bail by default under Section 167(2) of Cr.P.C. as the final report was not filed by the respondent police, despite lapse of 91 days and now charge sheet was filed after completion of investigation.

¶24

Considering the submissions putforth on either side,

¶25

2/4

¶26

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶27

CRL O.P. No.21630 of 2024

¶28

considering the representation made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner that there is life threat to the petitioner while complying with condition before the respondent police and considering the fact that the investigation was completed, I am inclined to modify the condition to the effect that "the petitioner shall appear before the jurisdictional Magistrate Court on every Monday for a period of 4 weeks". The other conditions imposed in the order dated 13.06.2024 in Crl. M.P. No.1754 of 2024 shall remain unaltered.

¶29

Accordingly, the condition is modified .

¶30

10.09.2024

¶31

index: Yes/No Internet: Yes/No Speaking/Non Speaking order mjs

¶32

¶33

1.The Judicial Magistrate No.II, Chengalpattu

¶34

The Inspector of Police, Otteri Police Station, Tambaram City. 3.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

¶35

P.DHANABAL, J mjs

¶36

3/4

¶37

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶38

CRL O.P. No.21630 of 2024

¶39

CRL. O.P. No.21630 of 2024

¶40

10.09.2024

¶41

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶42

4/4

Dinesh v. the State Rep by Its

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dinesh v. the State Rep by Its

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mohammed Ayub Vs the Inspector of Police,Vellore

G. Brindha, Vs State Rep by

Muthukumaran Sankarlal Vs State Rep. by

Annadurai Vs State Rep by

Nirmal Kumar Vs the State Rep.by Its

Sathish Vs the State Rep by