The court dismissed a petition seeking anticipatory bail under provisions of the BNS Act, 2023, as no FIR had been registered against the petitioner and the police had not harassed them during the enquiry.
Petition dismissed due to absence of FIR and lack of police harassment.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Crl.OP.No.19802 of 2024
P. DHANABAL, J
This petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking anticipatory bail, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences under Sections 117(3), 296 and 351(2) of BNS Act, 2023.
2.Today, when the matter came up for hearing, the learned Government Advocate [Criminal Side] appearing for the respondent submitted that no FIR has been registered against the petitioner and enquiry was conducted based on the complaint given by the defacto complainant and also the petitioner was not harassed by the respondent during the enquiry.
23.08.2024
MSM
1/1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the application for anticipatory bail merits admission?
PETITIONER
STATE OF TAMIL NADU
P. DHANABAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
