No.14 of 2012, wherein the respondent/tenant was served on with notice and subsequently, he filed his counter and also filed a set aside petition before the Rent Controller and the same was allowed. Accordingly, the Execution Petition in E.P.No.14 of 2012 was closed. Thereafter, he again remained exparte and hence, exparte order was passed on 29.11.2016. To execute the said order, the landlord filed an execution petition in E.P.No.317 of 2017, in which notice was also served on the respondent/judgment debtor/tenant and in that petition, he appeared, but not filed any counter. Thereafter, the delivery was ordered by the Executing Court on 13.11.2018, but the same was recalled suo motu on 15.11.2018. In the meanwhile, the respondent/tenant also filed a set aside petition and the same is pending for enquiry. At this juncture, the respondent/tenant filed a complaint under Sec.340 of Cr.P.C. pleased to conduct a preliminary enquiry as mandated under Sec.340 of Cr.P.C. against three persons named as 3 accused viz., (1) Selvam, Advocate for decree holder, (2) Amar D.Pandia, Advocate for the Decree holder and third one viz., Priya Krishna Murthy, who is a landlord and lodge a complaint before the learned Judicial Magistrate for prosecution of the accused for the offences under Sec.193, 196, 199, 200 and 209 I.P.C.
