Petitioners sought bail in a case involving illegal transport of 900 kg of banned tobacco products under IPC, tobacco and food safety laws. The court declined bail, citing the initial stage of investigation and the quantity involved, and dismissed the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Crl.O.P.No.15892 of 2024
T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.
This Criminal Original Petition has been filed by the petitioners/A2 & A3, who were arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 10.05.2024, seeking bail in Crime No.177 of 2024 registered for the offence under Sections 273, 328 of IPC r/w Sections 7, 21(1) of Cigarettes and other Tobacco Products Act, 2003 and Sections 58, 59 of Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006.
T.V.THAMILSELVI,J.
ham
Government Advocate (Crl.Side) that the investigation is at initial stage and considering the quantity of banned tobacco products transported by the accused, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioners.
05.07.2024
ham
Crl.O.P.No.15892 of 2024
1 issue framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to A2 and A3 arrested for transporting 900 kg of banned tobacco products while investigation is at an initial stage.
3 provisions across 3 enactments
A2
A3
T.V.Thamilselvi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
