Nithya v. State rep.by
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court directed the petitioner to appear before the respondent police before the order imposing a sum of Rs.3,00,000 was complied with. No further order was necessary on compliance.
What did the court decide?
Directive to appear before respondent police prior to compliance.
What the court decided
Crl.O.P.No.15590 of 2024 T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.
By its order dated 22.07.2024, this court has directed the petitioner to deposit a sum of Rs.3,00,000/- to the credit of Cr.No.90 of 2024 before the trial court.
- Today, the matter is listed under the caption, 'for reporting compliance'.
- When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner had duly complied the conditions imposed by this court. He has also filed a memo to that effect.
- The petitioner is directed to appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation.
5. O rder complied with. No further order is necessary.
Gv 01.08.2024
1/1
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner complied with the earlier order to deposit Rs.3,00,000/- and appear for interrogation under Cr.No.90 of 2024.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
T.V. Thamilselvi
- respondent
Respondent Police
Coram
T.V. Thamilselvi
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court