Allowed

R Palani v. State Rep by

Madras HC18 Jun 2024CRL OP/13921/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court granted anticipatory bail to a petitioner apprehending arrest for offences including robbery under Sections 395, 397 IPC. The court imposed conditions including daily police reporting, execution of bonds, and non-interference with investigation.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted subject to execution of bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties, daily police reporting for 8 weeks, and non-interference with investigation.

R Palani Vs State Rep by — Anticipatory Bail | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

T.V.TAMIILSELVI, J.,

¶2

Crl.O.P.No.13921 of 2024

¶3

Crl.O.P.No.13921 of 2024

¶4

The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 341, 294(b), 395, 397 and 506(2) of IPC, 1860 in Crime No.61 of 2024, on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

¶5

The case of the prosecution as per the defacto complainant is that on 14.02.2024, the petitioner along with other accused assaulted the defacto complainant and committed theft of lorry, containing 25 tons of iron materials from the defacto complainant at knife point. Hence the case.

¶6

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He also submits that the petitioner is ready to abide by any stringent conditions that may be imposed by this Court and hence, he prays to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

¶7

The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent submits that there are totally 8 accused in this case and the petitioner is A6. He further submits that there is three previous cases of

¶8

Page 1 of 5

¶9

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶10

Crl.O.P.No.13921 of 2024

¶11

similar nature pending as against the petitioner and that property was recovery from the petitioner. He also submits that co-accused in this case have already arrested and subsequently, released on bail. However, he opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

¶12

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) for the respondent and perused the entire materials available on record.

¶13

Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case

¶14

and the submissions made by the both counsel and also the fact that the property was recovered and co-accused were released on bail, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.

¶15

Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on

¶16

anticipatory bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen (15) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order before the

¶17

learned District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate, Madhavaram, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/-

¶18

Page 2 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶19

Crl.O.P.No.13921 of 2024

¶20

(Rupees Ten Thousand Only), with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that:

¶21

[a] the petitioner is directed to deposit a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) to the credit of the Principal Govt Yoga and Naturopathy Medical College, A/c.No.30143474408, IFSC Code:BIN0002196, MICR No.600002005, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and shall produce the said receipt before the concerned Court at the time of executing the bail bond"

¶22

[b] t he petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Court concerned may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity;

¶23

[c] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily for a period of eight weeks and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation;

¶24

[d] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;

¶25

[e] the petitioner shall not abscond either during

¶26

Page 3 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶27

Crl.O.P.No.13921 of 2024

¶28

investigation or trial;

¶29

[f] on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions has been imposed and the petitioner is released on anticipatory bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji Vs. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560]; and;

¶30

[g] if the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229-A IPC.

¶31

18.06.2024

¶32

ssi

¶33

Page 4 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶34

Crl.O.P.No.13921 of 2024

¶35

T.V.TAMIILSELVI, J.,

¶36

ssi

¶37

Crl.O.P.No.13921 of 2024

¶38

18.06.2024

¶39

Page 5 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

R Palani v. State Rep by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

R Palani v. State Rep by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Harinath Vs State Rep by

Sasikala And 2 Others Vs the Inspector of Police

S.Govindarajan Vs State Rep. by

Kothai Vs The Inpector Of Police

A.S.Venkatasubramanian Vs State of Tamil Nadu Rep. by

Sankar Vs the State Rep. by