Dismissed

C.Nallathambi v. J.M.Ravi Kumar

Madras HC26 Jun 2024CRL OP/11040/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court dismissed a Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 378 CrPC seeking special leave to appeal. The Court extinguished the associated Criminal Appeal at the Special Leave stage due to the petitioner's counsel seeking an adjournment, indicating lack of interest to prosecute.

What did the court decide?

Criminal Original Petition dismissed for non-prosecution; Criminal Appeal rejected at the Special Leave stage.

C.Nallathambi Vs J.M.Ravi Kumar — Madras HC (2024) — LawSathi Research

¶1

Crl.OP.No.11040 of 2023

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

Dated : 26.06.2024

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI

¶6

Crl.OP.No.11040 of 2023 in Crl.A.SR.No.63076 of 2023

¶7

C.Nallathambi

¶8

...Petitioner / Appellant

¶9

Vs.

¶10

J.M.Ravi Kumar ...Respondent

¶11

Prayer in Crl.OP.No.11040 of 2023: Petition filed under Section 378(4) of Code of Criminal Procedure to grant special leave to file criminal appeal against judgment dated 18.08.2023 in C.C.No.9953 of 2017 passed by the learned II Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore, Chennai.

¶12

Prayer in Crl.A.SR.No.63076 of 2023: Appeal filed under Section 378(4) of Code of Criminal Procedure to set aside the judgment dated 18.08.2023 in C.C.No.9953 of 2017 passed by the learned II Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore, Chennai.

¶13

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Elangovan (No Appearance)

¶14

ORDER

¶15

When the matter was listed for hearing on earlier occasion i.e.,

¶16

1/3

¶17

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶18

Crl.OP.No.11040 of 2023

¶19

24.06.2024, none appeared on behalf of the petitioner. Thus, this Court

¶20

passed an order, directing the Registry to list the matter on 26.06.2024 under the caption “For Dismissal”.

¶21

2. Even today, when the matter was taken up for hearing, though the learned counsel for the petitioner appeared before this Court, however, he only sought for further adjournment, which clearly shows that the learned counsel for the petitioner is not interested to prosecute the matter and therefore, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this Criminal Original Petition.

¶22

3. Accordingly, t his Criminal Original petition stands dismissed for non prosecution. Consequently, the Criminal Appeal is rejected at the SR stage itself.

¶23

26.06.2024

¶24

rap Index : Yes/No Speaking order : Yes/No NCC : Yes/No

¶25

2/3

¶26

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶27

Crl.OP.No.11040 of 2023

¶28

M.DHANDAPANI, J.

¶29

rap

¶30

Crl.OP.No.11040 of 2023 in Crl.A.SR.No.63076 of 2023

¶31

26.06.2024

¶32

3/3

¶33

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

C.Nallathambi v. J.M.Ravi Kumar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

C.Nallathambi v. J.M.Ravi Kumar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

P.Sathyamoorthy Vs The State Rep.

M/S.Gvn Enterprises Private Limited Vs Csi Arogyavaram Medical Centre

A. Vivekanandan Vs State Rep by

Duraisamy Vs Pachiyappan

J.Angel Vs C.Johnson

Parameswaran Vs a.G.Sampath