Petitioner sought anticipatory bail in a kidnapping case where the defacto complainant was allegedly waylaid, blindfolded and forced to transfer Rs.7,80,000 and sign blank promissory notes and car transfer forms. The court noted the money transfer on the date of the incident and that other accused were absconding, and dismissed the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Crl.O.P.No.1104 of 2024
Crl.O.P.No.1104 of 2024
C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J.
The petitioner/accused seeks anticipatory bail in Crime No.495 of 2023 registered by the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 323, 341, 347 and 365 of IPC.
1/4
Crl.O.P.No.1104 of 2024
civil issue and that there were several transactions between the petitioner and the defacto complainant.
transactions were in the year 2022 and have no connection with the demand made after being kidnapped.
date of kidnap there has been a transfer of Rs.7,80,000/- to the account of the one of the accused and also the signatures obtained in blank
2/4
Crl.O.P.No.1104 of 2024
Vv
16.02.2024
3/4
Crl.O.P.No.1104 of 2024
C.V.KARTHIKEYAN,J.
Vv
Crl.O.P.No.1104 of 2024
16.02.2024
4/4
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner accused in a kidnapping and extortion case.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Petitioner/Accused
Respondent Police
C.V.KARTHIKEYAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
