Agasthiyar v. The Inspector Of Police
Case brief
What is this about?
The Madurai Bench of Madras High Court modified the bail condition imposed on the appellant in a POCSO case appeal, directing monthly reporting to the trial court due to compliance.
What did the court decide?
The petitioner shall report before the concerned trial Court on the first working day of every English calendar month at 10.30 a.m., until further orders.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CRL MP(MD) No.6719 of 2024
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Thursday, the Fourth day of July Two Thousand and Twenty Four
PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr.Justice K.K. RAMAKRISHNAN
CRL.M.P.(MD)No.6719 of 2024
in
CRL.A(MD)No.372 of 2022
AGASTHIYAR
... PETITIONER/PETITIONER/APPELLANT Vs
THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE RAJAPALAYAM ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, VIRUDHUNAGAR
CRIME NO. 24 OF 2018 ... RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the bail conditions imposed on the petitioner in the POCSO case appeal need to be modified upon review of compliance.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
AGASTHIYAR
- respondent
THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE RAJAPALAYAM ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, VIRUDHUNAGAR
Coram
K.K. RAMAKRISHNAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court