Allowed

Anandhakumar v. The Inspector of Police

Madras HC11 Jun 2024CRL MP(MD)/5765/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this criminal miscellaneous petition, the petitioner sought to relax bail conditions imposed in a prior order. The court noted the Government Advocate's submission that the petitioner had complied with the conditions for 55 days and consequently relaxed them.

What did the court decide?

The condition imposed on the petitioner in Crl.O.P(MD) No.4669 of 2024 dated 25.03.2024 is relaxed.

Anandhakumar Vs The Inspector of Police — Bail and Remand | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

CRL MP(MD) No.5765 of 2024

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶3

Tuesday, the Eleventh day of June Two Thousand and Twenty Four

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon`ble Mr.Justice B.PUGALENDHI

¶6

CRL MP(MD) No.5765 of 2024 IN CRL OP(MD) No.4669 of 2024

¶7

ANANDHAKUMAR

¶8

... PETITIONER/PETITIONER

¶9

¶10

THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, ARUPPUKOTTAI, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT. CRIME NO.7/2024 ... RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT

¶11

Criminal Miscellaneous Petition filed praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the petition filed therewith the High Court may be pleased to relax the condition imposed by this Honble Court against the petitioner in Crl.OP(MD) No.4669/2024 dt 25.03.2024 on the file of the respondent police

¶12

Order : This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition coming up for orders on this day, upon perusing the petition filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of MR.R.VENKATESAN, Advocate for the petitioner and of MR.P.KOTTAI CHAMY, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) on behalf of the Respondent, the court made the following order:-

¶13

This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is filed by the petitioner to relax the

¶14

condition imposed on him by this Court in Crl.O.P(MD) No.4669 of 2024, dated

¶15

25.03.2024. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶16

1/3

¶17

CRL MP(MD) No.5765 of 2024

¶18

2.The learned Government Advocate(Crl.side) appearing for the respondent

¶19

submits that the petitioner is complying with the condition for 55 days.

¶20

3.Considering the said submission made by the learned Government Advocate

¶21

(Crl.side), the condition imposed on the petitioner in Crl.O.P(MD)No.4669 of 2024 is relaxed.

¶22

sd/11/06/2024 / TRUE COPY /

¶23

/06/2024

¶24

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S. I / II / III / IV ) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

¶25

gns

¶26

¶27

1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, ARUPPUKOTTAI.

¶28

2 DO THROUGH : THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, VIRUDHUANGAR DISTRICT @ SRIVILLIPUTHUR.

¶29

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, ARUPPUKOTTAI, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT.

¶30

4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

¶31

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶32

2/3

¶33

CRL MP(MD) No.5765 of 2024

¶34

ORDER IN CRL MP(MD) No.5765 of 2024 IN CRL OP(MD) No.4669 of 2024 Date :11/06/2024

¶35

RS/GS/SAR-(20.06.2024) 3P 5C Madurai Bench of Madras High Court is issuing certified copies in this format from 17/07/2023

¶36

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶37

3/3

Anandhakumar v. The Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Anandhakumar v. The Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Thiyagarajan Vs The Inspector of Police

Jyoti Tobi Jones Vs The District Collector

Sermadurai Vs The Inspector of Police

Malar Vs The Inspector of Police

Sivaji @ Rengarasu @Rengaraj Vs The Inspector of Police

G.Vivek Vs The Inspector of Police