Allowed

Senthilkumar v. The Inspector of Police

Madras HC8 Jan 2024CRL MP(MD)/125/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petition to relax the condition of daily appearance before police imposed in an earlier anticipatory bail-related order. The Government Advocate confirmed the petitioner was complying regularly. The court relaxed the condition, directing appearance only as and when required for interrogation.

What did the court decide?

Condition to appear daily before respondent police relaxed; petitioner to appear as and when required for interrogation.

Senthilkumar Vs The Inspector of Police — Anticipatory Bail | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

CRL MP(MD) No.125 of 2024

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶3

Monday, the Eighth day of January Two Thousand and Twenty Four

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon`ble Mr.Justice M.DHANDAPANI

¶6

CRL MP(MD) No.125 of 2024 IN CRL OP(MD) No.17137 of 2023

¶7

SENTHILKUMAR

¶8

... Petitioner / Rank Not known

¶9

¶10

THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE THIRUKOSTIYUR POLICE STATION, SIVAGANGAI DISTRICT. (CRIME NO.102 OF 2023.)

¶11

... Respondent / Complainant

¶12

Criminal Miscellaneous Petition filed praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the petition filed therewith the High Court may be pleased to relax the condition to appear before the Respondent Police daily at 10.30 A.M. until further orders imposed upon the Petitioner in Crl.OP.(MD).No.17137 of 2023 dt.22.9.2023 by this Honble Court.

¶13

Order : This criminal miscellaneous petition coming up for orders on this day, upon perusing the petition filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/s.T.VEERAKUMAR, Advocate for the petitioner and of Mr.P.KOTTAICHAMY, Government Advocate (Crl. side) on behalf of the Respondent, the court made the following order:-

¶14

Heard both sides.

¶15

According to the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), the petitioner is https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶16

1/3

¶17

CRL MP(MD) No.125 of 2024

¶18

complying with the condition imposed by this Court regularly.

¶19

Considering the fact that the petitioner is regularly complying with the

¶20

condition imposed by this Court, the condition already imposed on the petitioner is relaxed. However, it is made clear that the petitioner has to appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation.

¶21

sd/08/01/2024

¶22

/ TRUE COPY /

¶23

/01/2024 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S. I / II / III /IV) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

¶24

SSB

¶25

¶26

1.The Judicial Magistrate, Thiruppathur.

¶27

2.Do through the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sivagangai District.

¶28

3.The Inspector of Police, Thirukostiyur Police Station, Sivagangai District.

¶29

4.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

¶30

2/3

¶31

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶32

CRL MP(MD) No.125 of 2024

¶33

ORDER IN CRL MP(MD) No.125 of 2024 IN CRL OP(MD) No.17137 of 2023 Date :08/01/2024

¶34

ED/ JGB /SAR- (19/01/2024) 3P / 5C

¶35

Madurai Bench of Madras High Court is issuing certified copies in this format from 17/07/2023

¶36

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶37

3/3

Senthilkumar v. The Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Senthilkumar v. The Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vasanthi Vs The Inspector of Police

Kalidass Vs The Inspector of Police

Packiyaraj @ Backiyaraj Vs The Inspector of Police

Surya Vs The Inspector of Police

Nisanth Vs The Inspector Of Police

Rathna Prakash Vs The Inspector of Police