The court dismissed a petition under Section 389(1) Cr.P.C. seeking suspension of sentence for convictions under Sections 417 and 376 IPC. The court held that given the serious nature of sexual offenses and the lack of crucial contradictions in the conviction order, suspension was not warranted to avoid setting a bad precedent.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Crl.M.P.No.7618 of 2024 in Crl.A.No.566 of 2024
M.DHANDAPANI, J.
This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed u/s 389(1) of Cr.P.C, seeking to suspend the sentence imposed vide judgment of conviction and sentence dated 05.04.2024 in S.C.No.71 of 2021 on the file of the Additional Mahila Court at Villupuram.
Page No.1 of 4
months.
Page No.2 of 4
is based on cogent and convincing reasoning and the same does not require any interference at the hands of this Court. Therefore, this Court is not
inclined to suspend the sentence of imprisonment against the petitioner.
dismissed.
10.07.2024
rap
To
Page No.3 of 4
M.DHANDAPANI, J.
rap
Crl.M.P.No.7618 of 2024 in Crl.A.No.566 of 2024
10.07.2024
Page No.4 of 4
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the sentence imposed under Sections 417 and 376 IPC should be suspended pending appeal?
3 provisions across 2 enactments
Petitioner
State/Respondent
M.DHANDAPANI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
