Sathish v. the State Rep.by Its
Madras HCCRL MP/4269/2024
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
of 2024 in Crl.A.S.R. No.11303 of 2024…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
Crl.M.P. No.4269 of 2024 in
¶2
Crl.A.S.R. No.11303 of 2024
¶3
M.S.RAMESH, J., and SUNDER MOHAN, J.,
¶4
The petition is filed to condone the delay of 20 days in filing the appeal.
¶5
- Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor.
¶6
- Having satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit, filed in support of the petition, the delay is condoned and the petition is allowed.
¶7
- Registry is directed to number the appeal, if it is otherwise in order.
¶8
[M.S.R.J] [S.M.J] 11.03.2024
¶9
bga
¶11
Page No.1/1
Coram
AI extract
M.S. RAMESH
SUNDER MOHAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court