Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

Rani Vs the State Represented by — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2024)

Home
Madras HC
2024
Rani Vs the State Represented byRani v. the State Represented by

Dismissed

Rani v. the State Represented by

Madras HC16 Jul 2024CRL MP/3799/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This single-paragraph order dismisses a Criminal Miscellaneous Petition due to unsatisfactory affidavit reasons for producing an FIR copy.

What the court decided

AI extract

A

Crl.M.P.No.3799 of 2024 in

Crl.O.P.SR.No.10790 of 2024

Dr.G.JAYACHANDRAN , J.

The reason stated in the affidavit for the production of certified copy of the F.I.R is not satisfactory. Hence, this Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is dismissed.

16.07.2024

bsm

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Coram

AI extract

Dr.G.JAYACHANDRAN

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Madras HC
Decided on: 16 Jul 2024 · July
Registered: 29 Feb 2024
Case no.: CRL MP/3799/2024

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from G. Jayachandran

J.Kalaivani Vs the State Rep by
15 Jul 2024
C.Senthil Nathan Vs State Rep.by
15 Jul 2024
Leela Kumari Vs State by the Inspector of Police
15 Jul 2024
Deenathayalan Vs the Inspector of Police
16 Jul 2024

Cite this judgement

Rani v. the State Represented by, CRL MP/3799/2024 (MAD), decided on 16 July 2024.

The Madras High Court publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Bench / Coram

Dr.G.JAYACHANDRAN

Parties & counsel

Outcome

Dismissed

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

The petition was dismissed because the appellant failed to provide satisfactory reasons in the affidavit for the production of the certified copy of the First Information Report (FIR).

A compact analysis

This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.

CNR

HCMA010358082024

Topic

Writ and Judicial Review

Bench

G. Jayachandran

Disposal

DISMISSED

Mohamed Ismail Vs State Rep.by

16 Jul 2024

Katturaja Vs State Rep.by

16 Jul 2024