Allowed

Kumar v. the State Rep.by

Madras HC12 Jun 2024CRL MP/3395/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a Criminal Miscellaneous Petition under Section 389(1) Cr.P.C., the petitioner sought suspension of his sentence after conviction under Section 307 IPC. The Court noted arguable points in the pending appeal and granted suspension of the substantive sentence on bail conditions, directing appearance before the trial court monthly.

What did the court decide?

Substantive sentence of imprisonment suspended; petitioner enlarged on bail on conditions of executing bond with two sureties and monthly appearance.

Kumar Vs the State Rep.by — Bail and Remand | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

Crl.MP.No.3395 of 2024

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 12.06.2024

¶3

CORAM:

¶4

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI

¶5

Crl.MP.No.3395 of 2024 in Crl.A.No.233 of 2024

Kumar

...Petitioner

Vs.

The State Rep. By The Inspector of Police Anuparpalayam Police Station, Tiruppur District. (Crime No.199 of 2015) ...Respondent

¶10

Criminal Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 389(1) of Cr.P.C. to suspend the sentence passed in S.C.No.87 of 2021 on the file of the Learned Assistant Sessions Judge, Tiruppur dated 24.01.2024, convicting the petitioner under Section 307 of IPC and sentencing him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for seven years and imposing a fine of Rs.2,000/- and in default, to undergo rigorous imprisonment for six months, pending disposal of the above criminal appeal.

¶11

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Sabarigeethan

¶12

For Respondent : Mrs.G.V.Kasthuri, Addl. Public Prosecutor O R D E R

¶13

This Criminal Miscellaneous petition has been filed seeking to

¶14

1/4

¶15

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶16

Crl.MP.No.3395 of 2024

¶17

suspend the sentence of imprisonment imposed in S.C.No.87 of 2021 dated 24.01.2024 on the file of the Assistant Sessions Judge, Tiruppur and enlarge the petitioner on bail.

¶18

The petitioner/appellant was convicted for the offence under Section 307 of IPC and was sentenced to undergo 7 years of rigorous imprisonment and was ordered to pay a fine of Rs.2,000/- and in default of payment of fine, to undergo rigorous imprisonment for another six months, vide order dated 24.01.2024 made in SC.No.87 of 2021. Aggrieved by the same, the above appeal has been filed along with this petition seeking suspension of sentence.

¶19

Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that, there are lot of material contradictions in the evidence of the prosecution and the prosecution evidence is also highly unbelievable and petitioner is now confined in Central Prison, Coimbatore for about eight months.

¶20

Having regard to the fact that there are arguable points involved in the appeal and further, the appeal is not likely to be taken up for final

¶21

2/4

¶22

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶23

Crl.MP.No.3395 of 2024

¶24

hearing in the near future and also considering the period of incarceration, I am of the considered opinion that the petitioner is entitled for the relief of suspension of sentence.

¶25

Accordingly, the substantive sentence of imprisonment alone is suspended and the petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only), with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the Assistant Sessions Judge, Tiruppur and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the trial Court at 10.30 a.m. on the first working day of every English Calendar month, pending appeal.

¶26

This criminal miscellaneous petition is ordered accordingly.

12.06.2024

skt

M.DHANDAPANI, J.

skt

3/4

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶33

Crl.MP.No.3395 of 2024

¶34

¶35

The Assistant Sessions Judge, Tiruppur.

¶36

The Inspector of Police Anuparpalayam Police Station, Tiruppur District.

¶37

The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.

¶38

The Central Prison, Coimbatore.

¶39

Crl.MP.No.3395 of 2024 in Crl.A.No.233 of 2024

¶40

12.06.2024

¶41

4/4

¶42

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Kumar v. the State Rep.by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kumar v. the State Rep.by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

G.Madhu Vs S.Muthu

Raghuraman Vs Union Rep by

P.Sivabalan Vs Tamilpandiyan

Venkatesan Vs Inspector of police

Vijayalakshmi Vs The State Rep by

Paramasivam Vs State Rep by