Pusupathi v. Murugan
Case brief
What is this about?
Allowed a criminal miscellaneous petition seeking condonation of an 88-day delay in filing a criminal revision against a prior Magistrate's order.
What did the court decide?
Ayasha NIL
What the court decided
Crl.M.P.No.2751 of 2024 in Crl.RC.SR.No.7696 of 2024
M.DHANDAPANI, J.
The present miscellaneous petition has been filed seeking to condone the delay of 88 days in filing the criminal revision against the order passed in Crl.M.P.No.445 of 2021 in S.T.C.No.8 of 2019 dated 11.08.2023 by the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Nagapattinam, in full additional charge of Fast Track Judicial Magistrate, Nagapattinam.
2. The learned counsel for the respondent has no objection for this petition being allowed.
3. H aving satisfied with the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit filed in support of this petition, this petition stands allowed.
4. Registry is directed to number the criminal revision, if the papers are otherwise in order and post the main case for admission.
06.06.2024
ssb
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay of 88 days in filing the criminal revision under Section 378 CrPC be condoned.
Coram
M.DHANDAPANI
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court