Indira v. State Rep.by
Case brief
What is this about?
Petition to condone a 100-day delay in filing a criminal revision. The Government Advocate raised no objection and the second respondent did not oppose; the court condoned the delay and directed the Registry to number the revision if otherwise in order.
What did the court decide?
Delay of 100 days in filing the criminal revision condoned; Registry to number the revision if otherwise in order.
What the court decided
Crl.M.P.No.2513 of 2024 in Crl.R.C.SR.No.6377 of 2024
M. NIRMAL KUMAR, J
This petition is filed to condone the delay of 100 days in filing the above revision.
2.Mr.R.Koshore Kumar, learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) takes notice for the first respondent and he has got no objection in allowing this petition.
3.Pursuant to the order passed by this Court, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor served notice to the second respondent through the jurisdictional police. Today, the second respondent name is also printed in the cause list but there is no representation for the second respondent either in person or through her counsel. It is seen that the second respondent has got no serious objection in condoning the delay.
4.In view of the above, the delay stands condoned and the petition is ordered.
22.03.2024
rsi
Note: Registry is directed to number the Criminal Revision, if it is otherwise in order.
Parties & counsel
- respondent
First respondent
- respondent
Second respondent
Coram
M. Nirmal Kumar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court