Petitioner, shown as absconding accused in a charge sheet before the Judicial Magistrate No.II, Puducherry, sought extension of time or modification of bail conditions. The court declined and dismissed the petitions, pointing to Rule 22, 24 and Form 74 of the Criminal Rules of Practice.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Crl.M.P.Nos.2128 & 2131 of 2024 in Crl.O.P.No.13254 of 2023
C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J.
It is stated that charge sheet has been filed before the Judicial Magistrate No.II, Puducherry, in which, the petitioner/A2, is shown as an absconding accused.
2.Naturally, this Court cannot now grant extension of time or modify the condition.
3.Accordingly these Criminal Miscellaneous Petitions are dismissed. The petitioner may take advantage of Rule 22, 24 of Criminal Rules of Practice and Form 74 of the Criminal Rules of Practice.
20.03.2024
ata
C.V.Karthikeyan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
