Petition to condone a 20-day delay in filing an application for restoration of Criminal Appeal No.277 of 2010. Respondents' counsel raised no serious objection; the judge found the affidavit reasons reasonable and allowed the application, directing listing on 28.02.2024.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Crl.M.P.No.19953 of 2023 in Crl.A.No.277 of 2010
R.KALAIMATHI, J.,
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner.
application for restoration in the Criminal Appeal No.277 of 2010.
no serious objection. The reasons mentioned in the affidavit appears to be reasonable and in order to afford opportunity to the petitioner, this application stands allowed.
21.02.2024
mac
Note: Registry is directed to number the petition for restoration, if it is in order.
R.KALAIMATHI, J.,
1/2
mac
Crl.M.P.No.19953 of 2023 in Crl.A.No.277 of 2010
21.02.2024
R.Kalaimathi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
