Jegajothi v. Rafi Ahamed
Case brief
What is this about?
The Single Judge condensed the delay in filing a criminal revision petition. The court was satisfied with the facts stated in the affidavit and ordered the petition to be admitted.
What did the court decide?
The delay of 83 days was condoned.
What the court decided
Crl.M.P.No.16224 of 2024 in Crl.RC SR.No.7280 of 2024
SUNDER MOHAN, J.
This petition is filed to condone the delay of 83 days in filing the above revision.
2.Heard the learned counsel for petitioner as well as respondent.
3.Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the delay stands condoned and the petition is ordered.
19.12.2024
rgr
Note : Registry is directed to number the Criminal Revision, if it is otherwise in order and print the name of Mr.P.Tamilavel, as counsel for the respondent, at the time of admission.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to condone a delay of 83 days in filing a criminal revision.
Whether the reasons stated in the affidavit are acceptable for condoning delay.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
SUNDER MOHAN
- respondent
Mr. P. Tamilavel
Coram
SUNDER MOHAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court