Allowed

Senthil @ Senthil Kumar v. the State Rep by Its

Madras HC18 Jun 2024CRL MP/1568/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner convicted under Sections 307 and 294(b) IPC sought suspension of sentence pending criminal revision against appellate conviction. Court suspended the sentence and ordered release on bail with bond, sureties and weekly reporting conditions.

What did the court decide?

Suspension of imprisonment sentence; petitioner to be released on bail on Rs.10,000 bond with two like sureties and weekly court reporting till revision disposal.

Senthil @ Senthil Kumar Vs the State Rep by Its — Bail and Remand | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 18.06.2024

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI

¶6

Crl.M.P. No.1568 of 2024 in Crl.RC. No.184 of 2024

¶7

Senthil @ Senthil Kumar ... petitioner

¶8

-Vs-

¶9

The Inspector of Police, Sethiyathope Police Station, Chidhambaram Taluk. Cuddalore District.

¶10

... Respondent

¶11

Prayer : Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is filed under Sections 397 (i) of the Criminal Procedure Code, to suspend the sentence imposed in C.A.No.11 of 2023 dated 22.12.2023 on the file of the II Additional Sessions Judge, Chidambaram and confirming the conviction and sentence imposed in SC.No.54/2019 dated 27.01.2023 on the file of the Assistant Sessions Judge, Chidambaram and enlarge the petitioner on bail.

¶12

For petitioner : Mr.P.Sankarasubbu For Respondent : Mr.A.Gopinath Government Advocate (Crl. Side)

¶13

O R D E R

¶14

The Criminal Revision has been filed as against the Judgment and

¶15

sentence passed by the learned II Additional Sessions Judge,

¶16

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶17

¶18

Chidambaram in C.A.No.11/2023 dated 22.12.2023 and convicted the petitioner for an offence under Section 294(b) and 307 of IPC and sentenced to under Section 294(b) of IPC, one month simple imprisonment and to pay a fine of Rs.200/-, in default, to undergo one week and imprisonment and under Section 307 of IPC, sentenced to undergo seven years of RI and to pay a fine of Rs.1000/- in default, three months imprisonment. The above said sentences shall run concurrently. Challenging the same, the petitioner has filed Revision and the present miscellaneous petition seeking suspension of sentence of imprisonment.

¶19

The learned counsel for the petitioners has raised several arguable grounds insofar the petitioner and it will take some more time for this Court to take up the criminal revision and to dispose of the same. The learned counsel further submitted that the petitioner is in prison for more than six months.

¶20

The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent submitted that apart from this case, there are eight cases pending as against the petitioner, out of which, five cases have ended and

¶21

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶22

¶23

three cases are pending.

¶24

4.In the facts and circumstances of the case, the Criminal

¶25

Miscellaneous Petition is ordered and the punishment of imprisonment imposed as against the petitioner is hereby suspended and he is directed to be released on bail on the following conditions:

¶26

a) the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- to

¶27

the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate-I, Chidambaram along with two sureties for a like sum;

¶28

b) the petitioner shall report before the Court below on the first

¶29

working day of every week at 10.30 AM,till the disposal of the revision.

¶30

18.06.2024

¶31

rli

¶32

Note: Issue order copy on 19.06.2024 To

¶33

The Inspector of Police, Sethiyathope Police Station, Chidhambaram Taluk.

¶34

The II Additional Sessions Judge, Chidambaram.

¶35

The Assistant Sessions Judge, Chidambaram.

¶36

The Judicial Magistrate-I, Chidambaram.

¶37

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶38

¶39

The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.

¶40

M.DHANDAPANI, J.

¶41

rli

¶42

Crl.M.P. No.1568 of 2024 in Crl.RC. No.184 of 2024

¶43

18.06.2024

¶44

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Senthil @ Senthil Kumar v. the State Rep by Its

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Senthil @ Senthil Kumar v. the State Rep by Its

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Renuka J.Bhojani Vs K.Jegannathan

Lydia Rayan @ Renuka Devi Vs the Inspector of Police

M/S.Kag India Pvt. Ltd., Vs T.Manikandan

R.Rajarajeswari Vs R.Manivannan

G.Balaji Vs M.v.Ramesh

A. Vivekanandan Vs State Rep.by