This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Crl.M.P.No.14583 of 2024 in
Crl.A.No.1296 f 2024
S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J. AND
M.JOTHIRAMAN, J.
We have gone through the evidence of PW1, PW3 and Doctor's evidence PW10. The deceased had given declaration before PW3, who is the relative of the deceased. The Doctor's evidence also speaks about the nature of injuries. The declaration of the deceased before PW3 also reveals about the occurrence.
(S.M.S., J.) (M.J.R.,J.) 26.11.2024
gd
2 issues framed by the court
Whether suspension of sentence is warranted in the given facts.
Whether the Criminal Miscellaneous Petition should be allowed.
Petitioner
State
S.M. Subramaniam
M. Jothiraman
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
