Allowed
D Andrews v. State Rep by
Madras HCCRL MP/13728/2024
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The petitioner sought relaxation of a daily reporting condition imposed earlier before the respondent police for three months. The State confirmed regular compliance. The court relaxed the condition in toto.
What did the court decide?
Condition to report daily at 10.30 a.m. before the respondent police relaxed in toto.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
1
¶2
Crl.M.P. No.13728 of 2024 in Crl.O.P. No.15938 of 2024
¶3
P. DHANABAL, J.
¶4
The petition has been filed to relax the condition imposed in Crl.O.P.No. 15938 of 2024 dated 09.07.2024 to report before the respondent Police, daily at 10.30 a.m., for a period of three months.
¶5
- The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) would submit that the petitioner is complying with the conditions regularly.
¶6
- Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel on both side and the petitioner had complied with the condition without fail, this Court is inclined to relax the condition imposed on the petitioner in toto. Accordingly, ordered.
¶7
14.10.2024
¶8
vkr
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Petitioner in Crl.O.P. No. 15938 of 2024
- respondent
Respondent Police
Coram
AI extract
P. Dhanabal
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court