Allowed

Salaparai Mani @ Mani v. the State Rep. by

Madras HC6 Nov 2024CRL MP/11715/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Criminal Miscellaneous Petition filed to suspend sentence and enlarge the petitioner on bail. Court granted bail on conditions including weekly police reporting and monthly court appearance after noting arguable points in the appeal and similar treatment of another accused.

What did the court decide?

Sentence suspended; petitioner ordered to be released on bail with conditions of weekly police reporting and monthly court appearance.

Salaparai Mani @ Mani Vs the State Rep. by — Property and Title | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

Crl.M.P.No.11715 of 2024 in Crl.A.No.636 of 2023

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 06.11.2024

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN

¶6

Crl.M.P.No.11715 of 2024 in Crl.A.No.636 of 2023

¶7

Salaparai Mani @ Mani, S/o.Chinnasamy ... Petitioner

¶8

Vs.

¶9

The State rep.by: Inspector of Police, Yercaud Police Station, Salem District. Crime No.53/2016. ... Respondent

¶10

PRAYER: Criminal Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 389(1) of Code of Criminal Procedure, to suspend the sentence imposed in S.C.No.30 of 2017 dated 25.04.2023 on the file of the learned 1 st Additional Assistant Sessions Judge, Salem and enlarge the petitioner on bail pending disposal of the Crl.Appeal.

¶11

For Petitioner : Mr.R.Sankarasubbu For Respondent : Mr.R.Vinothraja, Government Advocate (Crl. Side)

¶12

ORDER

¶13

Page No.1 of 7

¶14

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶15

Crl.M.P.No.11715 of 2024 in Crl.A.No.636 of 2023

¶16

This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed to suspend the sentence of imprisonment imposed in S.C.No.30 of 2017, dated 25.04.2023 on the file of the I Additional Assistant Sessions Court, Salem and to enlarge the petitioner on bail pending disposal of the appeal.

¶17

2.It is the case of the prosecution that the petitioner along with other accused entered into a criminal conspiracy to commit dacoity at the house of the defacto complainant; and that pursuant to the said conspiracy, trespassed into the house of the defacto complainant; and that the petitioner armed with knife and iron rod along with A2 and committed dacoity of 21 sovereigns of gold jewels and cash of Rs.35,000/-.

¶18

3.The petitioner was convicted for offence under Sections 451 and 395 r/w 397 of IPC and in respect of conviction under Section 451 of IPC, the petitioner was sentenced to undergo four years imprisonment and was ordered to pay a fine of Rs.5,000/- and in default of payment of fine to undergo simple imprisonment for two months and in respect of the conviction under Section 395 r/w 397 of IPC, the petitioner was sentenced to undergo ten years of rigorous imprisonment and was ordered to pay a fine of Page No.2 of 7

¶19

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶20

Crl.M.P.No.11715 of 2024 in Crl.A.No.636 of 2023

¶21

Rs.5,000/- and in default of payment of fine, to undergo simple imprisonment for another two months vide judgment, dated 25.04.2023 made in S.C.No.30 of 2017.

¶22

4.Heard Mr.R.Sankarasubbu, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.R.Vinothraja, learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent/State.

¶23

5.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is innocent and no Test Identification Parade was conducted and that the recovery witnesses turned hostile and there are material contradictions in the evidence of the prosecution witnesses and hence, he prayed that the sentence imposed on the petitioner may be suspended.

¶24

6.The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) per contra submitted that the petitioner is an habitual offender and earlier suspension of sentence filed in Crl.M.P.No.8191 of 2023 in Crl.A.No.636 of 2023 was dismissed by this Court on 25.06.2024 by recording the fact that the petitioner had six previous cases against him.

¶25

Page No.3 of 7

¶26

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶27

Crl.M.P.No.11715 of 2024 in Crl.A.No.636 of 2023

¶28

7.The learned counsel for the petitioner in reply submitted that all the

¶29

cases against the petitioner except one have ended in acquittal and this fact was not brought to the notice of this Court while deciding the earlier petition for suspension of sentence. He further submitted that the petitioner was acquitted by the learned Judicial Magistrate, Yercaud in C.C.Nos.16, 17, 18 & 19 of 2023 by judgment, dated 31.08.2023.

¶30

8.The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) on instructions would submit that except for one case, which is pending before the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Salem, the petitioner has been acquitted in all other cases.

¶31

9.This Court is of the view that there is only one case is pending against the petitioner which was not brought to the notice of this Court earlier and that this Court had granted bail to A2 by order, dated 25.06.2024 in Crl.M.P.No.8191 of 2023 who is similarly placed. Since there are arguable points in the appeal and the sentence against the similarly placed accused has been suspended, this Court is inclined to grant relief of Page No.4 of 7

¶32

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶33

Crl.M.P.No.11715 of 2024 in Crl.A.No.636 of 2023

¶34

suspension of sentence to the petitioner.

¶35

10.Accordingly, this criminal miscellaneous petition stands allowed and the sentence imposed on the petitioner, is suspended and he is ordered to be released on bail on the following conditions:

¶36

(i)The petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/-

¶37

(Rupees ten thousand only), with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned I Additional Assistant Sessions Court, Salem;

¶38

(ii)The petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Trial Court may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book and mobile numbers to ensure their identity; and

¶39

(iii)The petitioner shall appear before the respondent Police once in a week at 10.30 a.m. until further orders; and

¶40

(iv)The petitioner shall appear before the trial Court on the first working day of every month at 10.30 a.m. until further orders and if he is not Page No.5 of 7

¶41

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶42

Crl.M.P.No.11715 of 2024 in Crl.A.No.636 of 2023

¶43

able to appear before the trial Court on any day, he shall make arrangements

¶44

to file an application under Section 317 Cr.P.C. and shall appear before the trial Court on any other day in lieu of the date of his absence, as directed by the trial Court.

06.11.2024

vv2

1.The I Additional Assistant Sessions Court, Salem.

¶49

2.The Inspector of Police, Yercaud Police Station, Salem District.

¶50

3.The Central Prison, Salem.

¶51

4.The Public Prosecutor, Madras High Court.

SUNDER MOHAN, J.

vv2

Page No.6 of 7

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶56

Crl.M.P.No.11715 of 2024 in Crl.A.No.636 of 2023

¶57

Crl.M.P.No.11715 of 2024 in Crl.A.No.636 of 2023

¶58

06.11.2024

¶59

Page No.7 of 7

¶60

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Salaparai Mani @ Mani v. the State Rep. by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Salaparai Mani @ Mani v. the State Rep. by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The Deputy Commissioner of Customs Vs Penshibabo Wang Private Limited

Ramesh Vs the State Rep. by

Murugan Vs the State Rep by Its

M/S. Northern Arc Capital Limited Vs M/S. Ms Enterprises

M/S. Northern Arc Capital Limited Vs Martruchhaya General Store

M/S. Northern Arc Capital Limited Vs M/S. Shanthi Steels