The High Court of Judicature at Madras dismissed the criminal appeal as abated on the ground that the respondent/accused, who is the brother of the complainant, was dead at the time of the hearing.
Criminal appeal dismissed as having abated due to the death of the respondent/accused.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Crl.A.No.569 of 2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 01.08.2024
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE R. HEMALATHA
Crl.A.No.569 of 2017
Selvaraj
... Appellant
Vs.
Sankar
... Respondent
Prayer : Criminal Appeal filed under Section 378 Criminal Procedure Code 1973 against the judgement and orders dated 02.01.2017 passed in C.A.No.7/2016 by the District and Sessions Judge, Thiruvarur, setting aside the judgement and orders dated 24.03.2016 passed in C.C.No.278/2010 by the Judicial Magistrate, Thiruthuraipoondi.
For Appellant : Mr.M.Vijayakumaran For Respondent : No appearance
Page 1 of 3
Crl.A.No.569 of 2017
JUDGMENT
When the matter is taken up for hearing today, it is represented
by the learned counsel for the appellant / complainant that the respondent / accused who is the own brother of the complainant, is dead. Hence, the Criminal Appeal stands dismissed as having abated.
01.08.2024
Index : yes/no Speaking /Non speaking Order mtl To
R. HEMALATHA, J.
Page 2 of 3
Crl.A.No.569 of 2017
mtl
Crl.A.No.569 of 2017
01.08.2024
Page 3 of 3
Selvaraj
Sankar
R. HEMALATHA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
