case is that on the next day, PW9, the Trap Laying Officer, alongwith the team, had went to Pondicherry and stayed at Railway Guest House and had summoned the de facto complainant, PW3 and PW3 is said to have given a written complaint, Ex.P6 on 23.1.2009 at the Railway Guest House, Pondicherry and it was sent to the office of CBI, Chennai through Fax on the same day at 12.30 hours and the FIR, Ex.P42 was said to have been registered on the same day at 12.42 hours. Subsequently, a trap was arranged, entrustment mahazar, Ex.P7 was said to have been prepared between 12.45 hours and 14.00 hours and that the trap team had gone to the office of the accused on the same day at 3.15 pm. It is the case of the prosecution that the tainted money was recovered and the recovery mahazar, Ex.P8 was prepared from 17.00 hours to 21.00 hours and thereafter, the accused was arrested and he was produced for remand before the Special Court on the same day at 10.30 pm. The appellant was shown to have been arrested under Ex.P11 at 16.20 hours and he was produced for remand before the Special Court at 10.30 pm on the same day. At the time of arrest, the respondent, has alongwith the remand report, enclosed the Fax copy of the FIR received from the Chennai office of CBI. Strangely, on the top portion of the fax copy of the FIR received
