K.Balasubramanian v. Mridula Ghai
Case brief
What is this about?
Contempt petition challenging non-compliance of a direction to the EPFO to act on a representation. Court noted the EPFO complied and dismissed the petition.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Cont P(MD).No.970 of 2024
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 29.07.2024
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR
CONT.P(MD)No.970 of 2024 in W.P(MD) No.23951 of 2023
K.Balasubramanian ... Petitioner/Petitioner
- Vs-
Ms.Mridula Ghai The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, Regional Office, Nariman Point, No.341, Bhavishya Nidhi Bhawan, Bandra (E), Mumbai – 400 051. ... Contemnor/2nd Respondent
PRAYER : Contempt Petition is filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, to punish the respondent herein for her wilful disobedience of the order of this Court in W.P(MD) No.23951 of 2023, dated 17.11.2023.
For Petitioner : Mr.M.Pounraj For Respondent : Mr.Anwar Sameem Standing Counsel
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
K.Balasubramanian
- respondent
Ms.Mridula Ghai
Coram
R.VIJAYAKUMAR
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court