S.Chellakannu v. Murugesan
Case brief
What is this about?
The petitioner sought punishment for the respondent's alleged willful disobedience of a previous order. Both parties submitted that the earlier order had been complied with. The contempt petition was closed on the basis of compliance.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Cont.P.(MD)No.883 of 2024
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 24.06.2024
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.MURALI SHANKAR
CONT.P(MD)No.883 of 2024 in W.P(MD)No.17248 of 2021
S.Chellakkannu
: Petitioner/Petitioner
Vs.
Murugesan, Revenue Divisional Officer, Pudukkottai, Pudukkottai District. : Contemnor /1st Respondent
PRAYER: Contempt Petition is filed under Section 11 of Contempt of Courts Act, to punish the contemnor/1st respondent for his willful, deliberate disobedience of the order of this Court in W.P.(MD)No.17248 of 2021, dated 24.09.2021.
For Petitioner : Mr.R.Paranjothi For Respondent : Mrs.K.Christy Theboral, Additional Government Pleader.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
S.Chellakkannu
- respondent
Murugesan, Revenue Divisional Officer
Coram
K.Murali Shankar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court