P.Indirani v. Sivakumar
Case brief
What is this about?
The Madras High Court recorded that the order in the underlying civil writ petition has been complied with and consequently closed the contempt petition filed for punishment of wilful disobedience.
What did the court decide?
Contempt petition closed due to recorded compliance with the previous order.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Cont.P.(MD) No.860 of 2024
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 04.10.2024
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE Ms.JUSTICE P.T.ASHA
Cont.P.(MD) No.860 of 2024 in W.P.(MD) No.1252 of 2020
P.Indirani
... Petitioner
/vs./
Sivakumar ... Contemnor
PRAYER: Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, to punish the respondent for the wilful disobedience of the order passed by this Court in W.P.(MD) No.1252 of 2020 dated 10.03.2023.
For Petitioner : Mr.C.M.Arumugam
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
P.Indirani
Coram
P.T.Asha
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court