Disposed

Abdul Raja Mohammed v. Senthamarai

Madras HC9 Feb 2024CONT P(MD)/73/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a contempt petition regarding disobedience of a prior order mandating a survey, the court considered the government pleader's submission of proof of survey. Finding grievances addressed if a representation was filed to the District Surveyor, the court closed the contempt petition without costs.

What did the court decide?

Contempt petition closed; petitioner allowed to file representation before the District Surveyor if grievances persist.

Abdul Raja Mohammed Vs Senthamarai — Execution and Attachment | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

Cont.P.(MD)No.73 of 2024

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 09.02.2024

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI

¶6

Cont.P.(MD)No.73 of 2024 in

¶7

W.P.(MD)No.18502 of 2023

Abdul Raja Mohammed

... Petitioner

versus

Senthamarai, The Tahsildar, Melur Taluk, Madurai District.

¶12

Kalaiyarasan, The Head Surveyor, Survey Branch, Melur Taluk Office, Madurai District. ... Respondents

¶13

Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of Contempt of Courts Act to punish the respondents for their willful disobedience of the order passed in W.P.(MD)No.18502 of 2023 dated 31.07.2023.

¶14

1/4

¶15

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶16

Cont.P.(MD)No.73 of 2024

¶17

For Petitioner : Mr.K.Vinayakan For Respondents : Mr.A.Baskaran, Additional Government Pleader

¶18

ORDER

¶19

This Contempt Petition has been filed that the respondents have not conducted survey as directed by this Court in W.P.(MD)No.18502 of 2023 dated 31.07.2023.

¶20

The learned Additional Government Pleader submits that on 13.10.2023, survey was conducted in Survey No.181/11A and boundaries have been marked. He has also produced a photograph to that effect.

¶21

However, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has disputed that survey was not conducted.

¶22

If the petitioner is still having any grievance, he is at liberty to

¶23

submit a representation before the appellate authority, namely, the

¶24

2/4

¶25

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶26

Cont.P.(MD)No.73 of 2024

¶27

District Surveyor, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶28

Accordingly, this Contempt Petition is closed. No costs.

¶29

09.02.2024

¶30

ogy NCC : Yes / No. Index : Yes / No. Internet : Yes / No.

¶31

¶32

Ms.Senthamarai, The Tahsildar, Melur Taluk, Madurai District.

¶33

Mr.Kalaiyarasan, The Head Surveyor, Survey Branch, Melur Taluk Office, Madurai District.

¶34

3/4

¶35

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶36

Cont.P.(MD)No.73 of 2024

¶37

B.PUGALENDHI, J.

¶38

ogy

¶39

Cont.P.(MD)No.73 of 2024

¶40

09.02.2024

¶41

4/4

¶42

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Abdul Raja Mohammed v. Senthamarai

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Abdul Raja Mohammed v. Senthamarai

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ibrahim Oli Vs The District Collector

Chinnappa.N Vs The Registering Authority

M/s.Statco Exports Pvt. Ltd., Vs The Commissioner of Customs

Palanichamy.v Vs The Commissioner

Mohamed Ibrahim.S.K Vs The Tamil Nadu Waqf Board

Arulmighu Kattu Karuppannasamy Temple Vs The Joint Commissioner (Hr and Ce)