The High Court of Madras, Madurai Bench disposed of a contempt petition filed against the Teachers Recruitment Board Chairman and Director of School Education alleging violation of an earlier order. The Court recorded that the order had been complied with and closed the petition without granting punishment or allowing the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Cont.P(MD)No.534 of 2024
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 22.07.2024
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR
Cont.P(MD)No.534 of 2024
1.S.Kumar
2.T.Ramesh
3.P.Kaliraja ... Petitioners / Petitioners
Vs.
1.Venkatapriya Chairman, Teachers Recruitment Board, 3rd Floor, Puratchi Thalaivar Dr.MGR Centenary Building, DPI Campus, College Road, Chennai-600 006. ... Contemnor / 2nd Respondent
2.G.Arivoli Director of School Education, DPI Campus, Chennai-6. ... Contemnor
(R2 is suo motu impleaded as 2nd contemnor as per the order of this Court, dated 24.06.2024)
PRAYER: Contempt Petition is filed under Section 11 of Contempt of Courts Act, to initiate contempt proceedings against the contemnor / 2nd respondent and punish her for the wilful disobedience of the order of this Court in W.P(MD)No.27630 of 2023, dated 30.11.2023.
Cont.P(MD)No.534 of 2024
For Petitioner : Mr.S.Rajasekar For R1 : Mr.VR.Shanmuganathan Standing Counsel For R2 : Mr.D.Sadiq Raja Additional Government Pleader
ORDER
The present contempt petition has been filed alleging violation of the order of this Court made in W.P(MD)No.27630 of 2023, dated 30.11.2023.
order of this Court has been complied with.
22.07.2024 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No gbg
2/4
Cont.P(MD)No.534 of 2024
To
3/4
Cont.P(MD)No.534 of 2024
R.VIJAYAKUMAR ,J.
gbg
Order made in Cont.P(MD)No.534 of 2024
22.07.2024
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the impugned order dated 30.11.2023 was violated by the respondents and if so, they ought to be punished.
Whether the complaint of non-compliance of the order dated 30.11.2023 is substantiated.
Whether the present contempt petition ought to be allowed and the respondents punished for wilful disobedience.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
W.P(MD)No.27630 of 2023Referred¶19
1 provisions across 1 enactments
S.Kumar
T.Ramesh
P.Kaliraja
Venkatapriya
G.Arivoli
R.VIJAYAKUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
