A.Meganathan v. Manimurugan
Case brief
What is this about?
Petition for contempt filed for non-compliance with an order was closed as an appeal was filed against the original order with an interim stay granted, allowing the petitioner to pursue the remedy thereafter.
What did the court decide?
Contempt petition closed with liberty to work out remedy on appeal outcome.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CONT.P.(MD)No.418 of 2024
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 22.03.2024
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI
CONT.P.(MD)No.418 of 2024 in WP(MD) No.22702 of 2023
A.Meganathan ... Petitioner
Vs
Mr.Manimurugan, Sub Registrar, (In the Cadre of District Registrar) Thallakulam, Madurai. ...Contemnor/Respondent
PRAYER: Contempt Petition filed under Section 10 of the Contempt of Courts Act, praying this Court to punish the contemnors/respondents under the provisions of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 for willful and deliberate disobedience of the order passed by this Court in WP(MD) No.22702 of 2023 dated 26.09.2023.
For Petitioner :Mr.P.Balasubramanian For Respondent :Mr.G.V.Vairam Santhosh Additional Government Pleader
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to grant relief in a contempt petition where an appeal with interim stay was filed against the impugned order.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
A.Meganathan
- respondent
Mr.Manimurugan
Coram
B.PUGALENDHI
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court