Contempt petition alleging wilful disobedience of a writ order. Counsel for the contemnors submitted that the underlying order dated 31.07.2023 had been complied with; the court recorded compliance and closed the contempt petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Cont.P.(MD).No.304 of 2023
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 04.12.2024
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI
Cont.P.(MD)No.304 of 2024
V.Suriyamoorthy ... Petitioner
-vs-
Thanjavur District.
PRAYER: Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Court Act, 1971 to punish the contemnors/respondents in accordance with law for their willful disobedience of the order in W.P(MD). No. 18437 of 2023 dated 31.07.2023.
1/4
Cont.P.(MD).No.304 of 2023
For Petitioner : Mr.N.Sudhagar Nagaraj For Contemnors : Mr.K.Jegadeesh Balan Standing Counsel
ORDER
The instant contempt petition has been filed alleging violation of the order of this Court dated 31.07.2023 passed in W.P.(MD). No. 18437/2023.
2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the order of this Court 31.07.2023 passed in W.P.(MD). No. 18437/2023 has been complied with. Recording the same, this contempt petition stands closed.
04.12.2024 NCC : Yes/No (1/36) Index : Yes / No sm
2/4
Cont.P.(MD).No.304 of 2023
To
Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Kumbakonam) Limited, Kumbakonam – 612 001, Thanjavur District.
General Manager,
Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Kumbakonam) Limited, Trichy Region, Periyamilagupaarai, Trichy District.
3/4
Cont.P.(MD).No.304 of 2023
L.VICTORIA GOWRI, J.
sm
Order made in Cont.P.(MD)No.304 of 2024 (1/36)
Dated: 04.12.2024
4/4
1 provisions across 1 enactments
V.Suriyamoorthy
R. Mohan
Sakthivel
L.Victoria Gowri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
