Disposed

Kavitha v. Dr.Darez Ahamed IAS

Madras HC29 Nov 2024CONT P(MD)/2527/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a writ petition under Section 11 of the Contempt of Court Act, 1971, the Court found that the contemnors had filed a separate writ petition challenging the settlement order with all 16 persons impleaded. The Court held that the petitioners must abide by the outcome of the connected writ petition and closed the contempt proceedings as the order was deemed complied with.

What did the court decide?

Contempt Petition closed. Parties directed to abide by the outcome of the connected writ petition regarding the settlement order.

Kavitha Vs Dr.Darez Ahamed IAS — Contempt of Court | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

CONT P(MD)No.2527 of 2024

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 29.11.2024

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY

¶6

CONT P(MD)No. 2527 of 2024 in W.P.(MD)No.19735 of 2023

Kavitha

... Petitioner

vs.

Dr.Darez Ahamed, I.A.S., The Chief Executive Officer, Tamil Nadu Wakf Board, No.1, Jaffar Sarang Street, Vallal Seethakathi Nagar, George Town, Chennai – 600 001.

¶11

S.Abdullah, The Superintendent of Wakf Board, No.8/124, II Floor, Kayithe Millath Road, Palakarai, Trichy – 620 008. ... Contemnors

¶12

PRAYER: Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Court Act, 1971, to punish the contemnors / respondents for their wilful disobedience of the order of this Court, made in W.P.(MD).No.19735 of 2023 and batch of cases, dated 10.10.2023.

¶13

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶14

1/4

¶15

CONT P(MD)No.2527 of 2024

¶16

For Petitioner : M/s.P.Santhana Krishnan

¶17

For Respondents : Mr.Haroon Rasheed, Standing Counsel

¶18

O R D E R

¶19

This Court has issued directions to consider the petitioner's claim based on the documents and pass orders.

¶20

Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the Learned Counsel appearing for the Contemnors submitted that they had considered the claim and pass order, dated 28.11.2024 in R.C.No.9347/23/B5/TRY. The claim of the petitioner was declined. Further the Contemnors have filed a separate writ petition challenging the settlement order. In the said writ petition all the 16 persons were impleaded as parties. Therefore, the parties shall abide the outcome of the order passed in the writ petition. Therefore, this Court is of the considered opinion that the order passed by this Court is complied with.

¶21

2/4

¶22

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶23

CONT P(MD)No.2527 of 2024

¶24

Accordingly, this Contempt Petition is closed.

¶25

29.11.2024

¶26

Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes KSA

¶27

¶28

Dr.Darez Ahamed, I.A.S., The Chief Executive Officer, Tamil Nadu Wakf Board, No.1, Jaffar Sarang Street, Vallal Seethakathi Nagar, George Town, Chennai – 600 001.

¶29

S.Abdullah, The Superintendent of Wakf Board, No.8/124, II Floor, Kayithe Millath Road, Palakarai, Trichy – 620 008.

¶30

3/4

¶31

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶32

CONT P(MD)No.2527 of 2024

¶33

S.SRIMATHY, J

¶34

KSA

¶35

Order made in CONT. P(MD)No.2527 of 2024

¶36

29.11.2024

¶37

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶38

4/4

Kavitha v. Dr.Darez Ahamed IAS

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kavitha v. Dr.Darez Ahamed IAS

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mohan Vs Shake Ummar

Sabura Bibi,W/O.M.S.Abubucker Vs T.Srinivasan(died)

Malaisamy Vs Sankaranpandian (Died)

Thanganallukoothan Vs S.K.Prabakar, Ias.

J.Ponnammal Vs the Secretary

A.K.G.Gopal Vs Dr.Darez Ahamed IAS