Ferrosco Industries Pvt. Ltd., v. Pradeep Yadav
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner filed a contempt petition for willful disobedience of a prior court order. The court recorded counsel's submission that the petitioner paid the required sum and the respondent restored electricity service, closing the petition without further adjudication.
What the court decided
Cont.P.(MD)No.238 of 2021
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 20.06.2024
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.MURALI SHANKAR
CONT.P(MD)No.238 of 2021 in W.P(MD)No.18887 of 2020
M/s.Ferrosco Industries Pvt. Ltd., through its authorized signatory, S.Amutha.
: Petitioner/ Petitioner/
Petitioner
Vs.
1.Pradeepyadav
2.Sundaravadhanam 3.Veeralakshmanan : Contemnors /Respondents 1 to 3/ Respondents 1 to 3
PRAYER: Contempt Petition is filed under Section 11 of Contempt of Courts Act, to pass an order by punishing the contemnors/respondents for their willful disobedience of the order passed by this Court in W.M.P(MD) No.15821 of 2020 in W.P(MD)No.18887 of 2020, dated 23.12.2020.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
M/s. Ferrosco Industries Pvt. Ltd.
- respondent
Pradeepyadav
- respondent
Sundaravadhanam
- respondent
Veeralakshmanan
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court